Conspiracy theories, who starts them and why?

Japan

I think you’re thinking of the the Clangers 🤔
The planet the Clangers live on is never given a specific name, but it is described as a "small, blue planet" or "moon-like planet". The show refers to it as "their world" or "the planet of the Clangers".

  • The planet is a small, blue world that serves as the home for the Clanger family.

  • It features a unique environment with music trees, a vertical lake, and caves where the Clangers live.

  • The series does not give the planet a formal name. It is simply referred to as the Clangers' home planet.
 
The planet the Clangers live on is never given a specific name, but it is described as a "small, blue planet" or "moon-like planet". The show refers to it as "their world" or "the planet of the Clangers".

  • The planet is a small, blue world that serves as the home for the Clanger family.

  • It features a unique environment with music trees, a vertical lake, and caves where the Clangers live.

  • The series does not give the planet a formal name. It is simply referred to as the Clangers' home planet.
How do they expect anyone to believe that? Finally a proper use for this thread!😁
 
Right so I just watched this first video in it's entirety and have a question to you Dox. Did you watch all 1hr 25 of it? What did you notice?
This was their first interview after getting back. In other interviews, astronauts talked about how bright the stars were from the moon.
One didn’t even know that he must’ve travelled through the Van Allan radiation belts..

This was not their first interview after getting back. They clearly state that in this video. This is several weeks after their return. They are probably a bit sick of endless debriefings I would imagine. I honestly saw nothing dodgy about this at all, three very smart, professional and highly observant men who talked plainly and honestly about their experience.
Some of the troll comments in the utube comments are really lowbrow and most of them are responded to appropriately.
Going back to my question, I could not for one second see any embarrassment, in fact all three were confident in their answers, some with humour, and were not just woodenly reading from scripts.
 
Right so I just watched this first video in it's entirety and have a question to you Dox. Did you watch all 1hr 25 of it? What did you notice?

This was not their first interview after getting back. They clearly state that in this video. This is several weeks after their return. They are probably a bit sick of endless debriefings I would imagine. I honestly saw nothing dodgy about this at all, three very smart, professional and highly observant men who talked plainly and honestly about their experience.
Some of the troll comments in the utube comments are really lowbrow and most of them are responded to appropriately.
Going back to my question, I could not for one second see any embarrassment, in fact all three were confident in their answers, some with humour, and were not just woodenly reading from scripts.

It is acknowledged as their first press interview - less than three weeks after getting back (from wherever they’d been 😁) and after being quarantined for weeks. I get that they will have been being interrogated (or something) during that time though.
Can you find an earlier interview? I know there’s their first TV interview but Collins mentioned shaving off his mustache in that one, so it’s from after this one. Weirdly the interviewers in that spent a lot of time asking about going to Mars in the future…you’ve got moon landers infront of you and you’re asking about what might happen in the future? Eh?

Anyway, as WCP acknowledges, we have our own confirmation biases, and mine is biased towards not believing it happened. A lot of their terminology seems geared towards trying to justify a lie.

Collins said he didn’t see any stars yet supposedly did multiple laps of the moon so would be in darkness for half the time…didn’t see any stars? Come on…

To believe the moon landings were real, you need to believe;

They went from an idea, to landing on the moon and getting back in under 10 years…just as JFK said they would
That they had the technology ti do it then, but we don’t now
That they ‘lost’ the data relating to the missions right around the time that technology to interpret and analyse it was becoming publicly available.

Not even getting on to things like the photographs; the phone call to Nixon; the lack of dust on the LEM; the panning shot of the LEM leaving the moon (that btw was like an outtake from the aforementioned Clangers), and on and on.

The most common thing people say in favour of them is ‘thousands of people couldn’t keep it secret’. Thats true, but thousands wouldn’t need to know. Dozens or a couple of hundred maybe. The only ones that need to know also know that they and anyone they know would be rubbed out at a moments notice if they couldn’t hold in “one of truth’s protective layers” anymore.
 
That they had the technology ti do it then, but we don’t now
This has been explained again and again. If you dont want to believe it, fine, but it has been thoroughly explained. The better question is why we are not going there at the moment, not can we.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dox
I couldn't give a flying fuck about the space race or who landed on the moon .. in my typical selfish thought process it makes absolutely fuck all difference to me ... but as someone who's seen the pictures over the years of the lunar craft that took men to the moon al I can say is 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 thems brave lads I'd not let the things take me to the bottom of my garden 👀
 
This has been explained again and again. If you dont want to believe it, fine, but it has been thoroughly explained. The better question is why we are not going there at the moment, not can we.

According to current belief it can’t be done because it would need multiple refuellings to get there, which doesn’t support having been before.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't give a flying fuck about the space race or who landed on the moon .. in my typical selfish thought process it makes absolutely fuck all difference to me ... but as someone who's seen the pictures over the years of the lunar craft that took men to the moon al I can say is 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 thems brave lads I'd not let the things take me to the bottom of my garden 👀

You can’t say that!

Look what happened to Gus Grissom after he called it a lemon - stay safe! 😁
 
According to current belief it can’t be done because it would need multiple refuellings to get there, which doesn’t support having been before.
So, do you believe that man has gone to space, and had to re-enter the apthmosphere?
Because once you are in space, with no aptmosphere, it takes zero energy to maintain momentum, you can use the gravity of the moon as a means of maintaining an orbit, and a small amount of energy to break out of the moons orbit and slingshot back towards earth.
 
I don’t know. I struggle accepting anything NASA tells us. And we all base our beliefs on such things, on what we’re told, not what we know. Mind you Katie Perry did it 🤣

This orbiting using the moons gravity…how does that work when the earth is between the spaceship and the moon?
Or the spaceship is between the moon and the earth?
 
I don’t know. I struggle accepting anything NASA tells us. And we all base our beliefs on such things, on what we’re told, not what we know. Mind you Katie Perry did it 🤣

This orbiting using the moons gravity…how does that work when the earth is between the spaceship and the moon?
Or the spaceship is between the moon and the earth?
Gravity?

That old chestnut? You can't believe in gravity, surely!
 
I don’t know. I struggle accepting anything NASA tells us. And we all base our beliefs on such things, on what we’re told, not what we know. Mind you Katie Perry did it 🤣

This orbiting using the moons gravity…how does that work when the earth is between the spaceship and the moon?
Or the spaceship is between the moon and the earth?
Sorry, I'm not going there. You can easily find out about all this stuff if you are interested?
 
Sorry, I'm not going there. You can easily find out about all this stuff if you are interested?

I'm sure there is an explanation, but I've probably not got the knowledge to work out if it's flawed or not.

We're never going to agree on this, and many other things.

It's like colours. How does anyone else know they are seeing colours exactly the way you do, or I do. We don't - we see colours the way we see them, you might (will?) see them differently. It might only be a slight difference, or might not.

Anyway, on some subjects we're only going to see them the way we do and can't see them the way others do. It's not the best analogy as at one time I used to believe we were told the truth by officials too, so I have seen them that way. Then I had doubts, and then an event happened that proved the scale of lies we're exposed to regularly.
 
I'm sure there is an explanation, but I've probably not got the knowledge to work out if it's flawed or not.

We're never going to agree on this, and many other things.

It's like colours. How does anyone else know they are seeing colours exactly the way you do, or I do. We don't - we see colours the way we see them, you might (will?) see them differently. It might only be a slight difference, or might not.

Anyway, on some subjects we're only going to see them the way we do and can't see them the way others do. It's not the best analogy as at one time I used to believe we were told the truth by officials too, so I have seen them that way. Then I had doubts, and then an event happened that proved the scale of lies we're exposed to regularly.

True.

Not everything is yellow and blue.
 
Back
Top Bottom