Very interesting and awesome and strange stuff with videos and pictures etc!!

There is no proof of sheep evolving into cows (for example).
Cows evolved into sheep 🤷‍♂️

Here's proof:


blamb+(1).webp
 
The rh blood group is something that science can't explain!!

The Rh blood group system, like the ABO system, classifies blood based on the presence or absence of specific antigens on red blood cells. The key Rh antigen is the D antigen. Individuals with the RhD antigen are considered Rh positive, and those lacking it are Rh negative. This classification determines whether someone's blood type is positive or negative after the A, B, AB, or O designation.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • RhD Antigen: The RhD antigen is a protein found on the surface of red blood cells.

  • Rh Positive: If the RhD antigen is present on a person's red blood cells, their blood type is Rh positive.

  • Rh Negative: If the RhD antigen is absent, the blood type is Rh negative.

  • Importance in Blood Transfusions: Rh compatibility is crucial in blood transfusions to prevent adverse reactions.

  • Importance in Pregnancy: Rh incompatibility between a Rh-negative mother and a Rh-positive fetus can lead to a condition called hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).
In summary, the Rh blood group system is based on the presence or absence of the RhD antigen on red blood cells, determining whether someone's blood type is positive or negative, and this is important for blood transfusions and pregnancy.
 
It's just a bridge to explain certain things, it's just the easy way out!! Lazy science to explain something they have no clue about!!
PerryL, so I mean @WAYNE have you considered my advice to stay away from the internet ,,, say for a month... I think it will do you good... just ride, walk and listen to music. Avoid the news.
 
The Rh blood group system, like the ABO system, classifies blood based on the presence or absence of specific antigens on red blood cells. The key Rh antigen is the D antigen. Individuals with the RhD antigen are considered Rh positive, and those lacking it are Rh negative. This classification determines whether someone's blood type is positive or negative after the A, B, AB, or O designation.

Here's a more detailed explanation:
  • RhD Antigen: The RhD antigen is a protein found on the surface of red blood cells.

  • Rh Positive: If the RhD antigen is present on a person's red blood cells, their blood type is Rh positive.

  • Rh Negative: If the RhD antigen is absent, the blood type is Rh negative.

  • Importance in Blood Transfusions: Rh compatibility is crucial in blood transfusions to prevent adverse reactions.

  • Importance in Pregnancy: Rh incompatibility between a Rh-negative mother and a Rh-positive fetus can lead to a condition called hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN).
In summary, the Rh blood group system is based on the presence or absence of the RhD antigen on red blood cells, determining whether someone's blood type is positive or negative, and this is important for blood transfusions and pregnancy.
When an RH Negative women becomes pregnant she needs to get medical help as the body attacks the baby in an attempt to kill it!!
 
And that is what evolution is. You agree that it is a thing then.

I agree with micro evolution - not with evolving from one set into another.

A zeedonk is still a member of the equivalent family…a labradoodle is still a canine…a Nigerian crossed with a Filipino is still a homo sapien.

Do you agree that there is never an example of evolution from one family to another?
 
I agree with micro evolution - not with evolving from one set into another.

A zeedonk is still a member of the equivalent family…a labradoodle is still a canine…a Nigerian crossed with a Filipino is still a homo sapien.

Do you agree that there is never an example of evolution from one family to another?
African people are not caucasian!!
 
I agree with micro evolution - not with evolving from one set into another.

Do you agree that there is never an example of evolution from one family to another?
Over millions of years? I wouldn t be surprised. I know that neither you nor me know the answer to that one…
I made my point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dox
Well, there’s no evidence it ever has happened.
And a reason it’s still called the ‘theory of evolution’.
Evolution is widely considered both a scientific theory and a fact. The scientific definition of "theory" is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, while the colloquial definition often implies "not proven". In science, "fact" refers to observations that have been repeatedly confirmed and are accepted as true for all practical purposes.

Here's why evolution is considered both:
  • Fact:
    Evolution, in the sense of change in organisms over time, is a fact because it's directly observable in laboratory experiments and natural populations. For example, the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a clear example of evolution in action.
    • Theory:
      The theory of evolution explains how evolution happens, primarily through the mechanisms of natural selection, genetic mutation, and genetic drift. It's supported by an overwhelming amount of evidence, including the fossil record, comparative anatomy, biogeography, and genetics.
 
Evolution is widely considered both a scientific theory and a fact. The scientific definition of "theory" is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, while the colloquial definition often implies "not proven". In science, "fact" refers to observations that have been repeatedly confirmed and are accepted as true for all practical purposes.

Here's why evolution is considered both:
  • Fact:
    Evolution, in the sense of change in organisms over time, is a fact because it's directly observable in laboratory experiments and natural populations. For example, the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a clear example of evolution in action.
    • Theory:
      The theory of evolution explains how evolution happens, primarily through the mechanisms of natural selection, genetic mutation, and genetic drift. It's supported by an overwhelming amount of evidence, including the fossil record, comparative anatomy, biogeography, and genetics.

Err…not the fossil record…that’s why it is still a theory (and in the ‘theory’ part?)
 
Micro evolution within a species, yes, but there’s no proof of one species evolving to
you do realize that atomic theory is still a theory, cell theory is still a theory, gravity is a theory yet we can build bombs, cure diseases and fly airplanes. Funny that a preson using a cell phone to communicate on the internet would doubt science but what do I know
Err…not the fossil record…that’s why it is still a theory (and in the ‘theory’ part?)
 
Back
Top Bottom