Very interesting and awesome and strange stuff with videos and pictures etc!!

Unhinged said:
"To explain gravity, some claim that the flat Earth is accelerating upwards constantly, giving the effect of things being drawn backwards towards the surface, in the same way you feel heavier when going up in a lift."
The problem with this theory is that the earth would have to be continously accelerating at the exact same rate for 4.3 billion years so far with no end in sight. The lift analogy fails because you only initially feel the ""heavier weight" until you reach travel speed then no more gravity? What source of energy would be capable of pushing the entire earth faster and faster for billions of years. Lets look at the lift example: most lifts are more than 200 ft per min, at this rate the earth would be into what ever comes after trillions and that would be our current rate of speed. That is a number with 7 digits followed by 12 Zeros! 2261628000000000000 Feet per minuite x 200 then divide by 60. and still accelerating, many factors faster than the speed of light in a vacuum! Guess that prioves it must be true the earth is flat.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/25/could-the-earth-really-be-flat/
Click to expand...
 
The following year where the crop circles are (real one's) there is a ghost image left in the crop the following year!!:)

 
Last edited:
Maybe not the best place to post, but whatevs 😁

Two countries split from the same colonial body in 1965. One picked economic freedom. The other picked handouts and racial spoils. You already know how this ended.

Singapore had no oil, no farmland, no hinterland. Just a swamp and a port. Lee Kuan Yew looked at that and trusted trade, low taxes, and hard money. A meritocracy. Central planners hate what he did.

Malaysia has the world’s largest gold mine and abundant mineral and oil resources. Yet it went the other way. In 1971 Kuala Lumpur launched the New Economic Policy, a state program handing quotas, contracts, and university seats to ethnic Malays. Politicians decided who got what. A commissar fantasy dressed in liberal language.

Now let's look at the numbers. In 1965 both places sat around $500 per capita. Today Singapore clears $84,000. Malaysia sits near $13,000. Same climate, same starting line, one sixth the result.

The Singapore dollar holds its value because the Monetary Authority of Singapore manages it against a currency basket and refuses to print its way out of trouble. The ringgit has lost roughly two thirds of its value against the Singapore dollar since 1981.

You cannot subsidize your way to wealth. You cannot redistribute what you never let people produce. Every ringgit funneled through a quota is a ringgit some bureaucrat spent on his own vision instead of a customer's.

Malaysia bet on planners deciding outcomes. Singapore bet on people deciding for themselves. The gap between $84,000 and $13,000 is your answer.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom