Why are we having to pay ulez and congestion charges if all vehicles that are 3 years older or more, past the emissions test on the government sanctioned MOT's![]()
Imagine my shock at reading research sponsored by Nescafe showing the health benefits of coffee.Your response is amusing. Look at you playing Climate Scientist.
What are your qualifications and professional experience in this discipline? SFA.
A similar phenomenon occurs in practising law - the absolute worst clients are those who think, with misplaced confidence, that they have some knowledge of the Law. The Practitioner then has the laborious task of trying to re-educate their client before they can provide advice, instead of just giving advice ab initio.
Not really. Until then no world leader had ever pushed a green agender so when she said in the 80's ;
"What we are now doing to the world, by degrading the land surfaces, by polluting the waters and by adding greenhouse gases to the air at an unprecedented rate - all this is new in the experience of the earth. It is mankind and his activities that are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways."
She continued: "The result is that change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. It is comparable in its implications to the discovery of how to split the atom. Indeed, its results could be even more far-reaching."It is no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay. We shall only succeed in dealing with the problems through a vast international, co-operative effort."
She understood that internationally that "get it done" is the way the world should work.
Jonathon Porritt, then head of Friends of the Earth, admitted: "It wasn't until Mrs Thatcher went into her short-lived green period that things really took off (for the green movement)."Before Mrs Thatcher started to talk about the ozone layer and climate change, lots of people said: 'These green issues are just for weirdos treehugging. But if Mrs Thatcher's saying something like that - there must be something in it'."
Another thing to blame on the Horible cunnntNot really. Until then no world leader had ever pushed a green agender so when she said in the 80's ;
"What we are now doing to the world, by degrading the land surfaces, by polluting the waters and by adding greenhouse gases to the air at an unprecedented rate - all this is new in the experience of the earth. It is mankind and his activities that are changing the environment of our planet in damaging and dangerous ways."
She continued: "The result is that change in future is likely to be more fundamental and more widespread than anything we have known hitherto. It is comparable in its implications to the discovery of how to split the atom. Indeed, its results could be even more far-reaching."It is no good squabbling over who is responsible or who should pay. We shall only succeed in dealing with the problems through a vast international, co-operative effort."
She understood that internationally that "get it done" is the way the world should work.
Jonathon Porritt, then head of Friends of the Earth, admitted: "It wasn't until Mrs Thatcher went into her short-lived green period that things really took off (for the green movement)."Before Mrs Thatcher started to talk about the ozone layer and climate change, lots of people said: 'These green issues are just for weirdos treehugging. But if Mrs Thatcher's saying something like that - there must be something in it'."
Thinking about that, how is it socialism, or do I misunderstand socialism?We're feeling the effects of it now as the green measures continue to encroach on our freedoms while driving up costs. Which I believe was their intention and why they cherry pick the facts that suit while ignoring those that don't. It won't be long until we're locked down permanently in 15 minute cities while the elites fly around in their private jets, all to save the planet of course. (Sarcasm).
View attachment 84293
Still waiting an answer from EverSlow on this one - when he loses he runs away, then pops up elsewhere on the attackOh deary deary me, your climate experts are saying Cyclones have decreased due to Climate Change!!!!!!!!!!! Now what you gonna do
While cyclone frequency has declined over 1900-2012 in six of the seven regions the study investigates, the researchers find a slight increase in the North Atlantic, driven by a rising trend over recent decades. They suggest that this is due to a combination of natural variability and a decrease in local air pollution.27 Jun 2022
Tropical cyclones now '13% less frequent' due to climate change
Tropical cyclones now ‘13% less frequent’ due to climate change - Carbon Brief.
And still keep taking itThinking about that, how is it socialism, or do I misunderstand socialism?
Unless it’s now taxing the hell out of the working people and charging them more for products / services to make the rich richer ?
All the ‘measures’ to fix climate change seem to affect the poor more.
You state, time and again, that I bow to authority. As a Lawyer a central tenet of my profession is to question and investigate the foundation of any purported source of authority.
You are incapable of questioning in any sensible way disciplines such as physics, chemistry or mathematics. The disciplines that fall within the umbrella of "climate science" are no different - they simply find themselves in the political crosshairs for questioning the impact of the enormously powerful energy industry.
You remind me of those in the '80s denying any link between smoking and cancer. Hell, you probably still believe that.
Here you go - more phd's than you can shake a stick at - should be right up your street. Are you still of the opinion that you shouldn't question experts? Or is it just the experts who prop up your beliefs?
![]()
Facts Archive - CO2 Coalition
co2coalition.org
That is the best you can do - highlight the CO2Coalition as a source of any factual information?
What a sad and pathetic effort. They were recently in the news for trying to push their snake oil:
"Climate deniers ejected from teachers conference for pro-carbon comic
At a meeting of science teachers, the CO2 Coalition handed out comic books depicting carbon as good for the planet. They got kicked out."
Full story:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/04/11/co2-coalition-climate-denial/
All you're responses are along the lines of "the people pushing the climate crisis say that your info is wrong".
But they don't disprove the evidence. And you're happy to go along with that.
Fuck sake you complete gobshite why are you worried about climate change?? Your bike skills are obviously far more dangerous to your health than a warm day!! Have you thought of maybe getting a Mobility scooter?? Although you'd probably crash that too... You best stay off anything with wheelsRubbish. My response was nothing to do with "people pushing the climate response".
It highlighted a Washington Post article that outlined the "CO2Coalition" (which you endorsed) were a small group of climate deniers - NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE.
Laughably the mongs @Exige @WAYNE and @The skitz gave your post likes - not because they agree with the detail but because they are amongst that ever shrinking group of climate change deniers.
You and your mates are going the way of the Dodo.
I don't have any further time to reply to you or their trolling.
You and your mates are going the way of the Dodo.
Not if I eat them firstEaten into extinction by the introduction of Dutch pigs?
Rubbish. My response was nothing to do with "people pushing the climate response".
It highlighted a Washington Post article that outlined the "CO2Coalition" (which you endorsed) were a small group of climate deniers - NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE.
Laughably the mongs @Exige @WAYNE and @The skitz gave your post likes - not because they agree with the detail but because they are amongst that ever shrinking group of climate change deniers.
You and your mates are going the way of the Dodo.
I don't have any further time to reply to you or their trolling.
Rubbish. My response was nothing to do with "people pushing the climate response".
It highlighted a Washington Post article that outlined the "CO2Coalition" (which you endorsed) were a small group of climate deniers - NOT A CREDIBLE SOURCE.
Laughably the mongs @Exige @WAYNE and @The skitz gave your post likes - not because they agree with the detail but because they are amongst that ever shrinking group of climate change deniers.
You and your mates are going the way of the Dodo.
I don't have any further time to reply to you or their trolling.
Laughably the mongs @Exige @WAYNE and @The skitz gave your post likes - not because they agree with the detail but because they are amongst that ever shrinking group of climate change deniers.
He's a MenkMong
Shortened version of mongoloid, a person with Down's syndrome.
Not very PC, you Rainbow Warrior you.