Climate Change (Global Warming) 🥶🌍🌞

The skitz said:
The fucktards here announced a weight tax to mch applause from the thick fuck environmentalists 😆 till they realised all the battery cars are fucking heavyweight... government now gone quiet 👀
Click to expand...
My "SUV" (dunno where the sport bit comes in) has a 2.2 L engine. Not exactly massive. Presumably every car with an engine larger than that will be banned as well? That would mean just about everyone where I live banned from city centres as they all seem to drive Merc MLs or 5 series Beemers.
My car weighs 2100 kg, about the same as any four door performance or distance (ie useable) EV. So what's the difference?
The difference is that the lefty urban mindset sees 4x4s as cars driven by country people who wear corduroys, own labrabors and shoot things. They don't hate the cars, they hate the people they think drive the cars.

It's the same mindset that saw people in the former East Germany forced to drive Trabants. That ended well..
 
Gimlet said:
My "SUV" (dunno where the sport bit comes in) has a 2.2 L engine. Not exactly massive. Presumably every car with an engine larger than that will be banned as well? That would mean just about everyone where I live banned from city centres as they all seem to drive Merc MLs or 5 series Beemers.
My car weighs 2100 kg, about the same as any four door performance or distance (ie useable) EV. So what's the difference?
The difference is that the lefty urban mindset sees 4x4s as cars driven by country people who wear corduroys, own labrabors and shoot things. They don't hate the cars, they hate the people they think drive the cars.

It's the same mindset that saw people in the former East Germany forced to drive Trabants.
Click to expand...
There would have to be exceptions? You can't (legally) tow 3.5 tonnes with lightweight vehicles
 
IMG_5592.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dox
I love how people are still, after all this time, framing "renewables" as a piss-poor way of generating electricity instead of characterising it for what it really is.

Amazing.
 
Starmer's 40th foreign trip since becoming an out of control knob head!
He wasn't even due to go but just changed his mind as he's scared of PM's Question Time.

Just been on't telle that the Labour outrage going with him to COP30 is 450 wankers, yep, 450 of the stupid idiots flying 9000 miles to COP30 😮



Starmer to fly over 9,000 miles to attend Brazil’s Cop30 climate summit​

 
Exige said:
Starmer's 40th foreign trip since becoming an out of control knob head!
He wasn't even due to go but just changed his mind as he's scared of PM's Question Time.

Just been on't telle that the Labour outrage going with him to COP30 is 450 wankers, yep, 450 of the stupid idiots flying 9000 miles to COP30 😮



Starmer to fly over 9,000 miles to attend Brazil’s Cop30 climate summit​

Click to expand...

Doesn't he have a climate kunt to do that job - what's he going for, so other leaders can mug him off?

He's obviously a cuck who likes being humiliated.
 
Dox said:
Doesn't he have a climate kunt to do that job - what's he going for, so other leaders can mug him off?

He's obviously a cuck who likes being humiliated.
Click to expand...
Or is he going so he can avoid the (take your pick)
Grooming gangs scandal
The sentencing bill
Flatlining economy
Or the up and coming tax rises
Or all of the above
 
This Guinness gets worse - you would think it was impossible but he continues to excel :ROFLMAO:



Ed Miliband’s new green jobs will bring Britain hope. I dare Reform to denounce them​

AA1ORjss.webp
 
Came across this from the ONS

UK Environmental Accounts: 2025 Some interesting facts.

UK greenhouse gas emissions on a residence basis in 2023 were 479 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) - the lowest since 1990,

For every £ million of UK economic activity, the UK emitted 160 tonnes of CO2e in 2023, 71.4% down from 560 tonnes in 1990.

Total UK greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on this basis in 2023 were 479 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e). This is below the previous record low estimate in 2020. UK emissions have fallen 43.0% on this basis since 1990, with the 66.0% fall in energy industry emissions being one of the main factors.

Emissions from the agriculture industry have remained relatively flat since 1990, while other high-emitting industries have seen greater fluctuations.

Since 1990, the UK economy's emission intensity has fallen 71.4%, from 560 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent
(CO2e) per £ million of gross value added (GVA) in 1990 to 160 tonnes in 2023.

All those were within the first few pages but all show falls in emissions and not the rises government often claim

I've tried to copy the link but if you type into your search engine, UK Environmental Accounts, showing 5 Jun 2025, it will download the report

Screenshot 2025-10-23 21.09.34.webp
 
Noobie said:
Came across this from the ONS

UK Environmental Accounts: 2025 Some interesting facts.

UK greenhouse gas emissions on a residence basis in 2023 were 479 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e) - the lowest since 1990,

For every £ million of UK economic activity, the UK emitted 160 tonnes of CO2e in 2023, 71.4% down from 560 tonnes in 1990.

Total UK greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions on this basis in 2023 were 479 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent (MtCO2e). This is below the previous record low estimate in 2020. UK emissions have fallen 43.0% on this basis since 1990, with the 66.0% fall in energy industry emissions being one of the main factors.

Emissions from the agriculture industry have remained relatively flat since 1990, while other high-emitting industries have seen greater fluctuations.

Since 1990, the UK economy's emission intensity has fallen 71.4%, from 560 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent
(CO2e) per £ million of gross value added (GVA) in 1990 to 160 tonnes in 2023.

All those were within the first few pages but all show falls in emissions and not the rises government often claim

I've tried to copy the link but if you type into your search engine, UK Environmental Accounts, showing 5 Jun 2025, it will download the report

View attachment 149653
Click to expand...
It’s making a difference 🤣🤣🤣

IMG_3146.webp
 
It all evolves around the cooling process. Approximately 80% of the water (typically freshwater) withdrawn by data centers evaporates, with the remaining water discharged to municipal wastewater facilities. The large volume of wastewater from data centres may overwhelm existing local facilities, which were not designed to handle such a high volume.

With evaporation being the main cooling process, 100% of water taken in doesn't mean 100% of that water comes back out. So in countries such as the U.K. where water retention has seen very little done since victorian times, you will have vast data centre useage now fighting with other industries, even farming, for fresh water sources wether they be from rivers or the data centre companies drilling down into historic aquifers and removing that water from the social and environmental existing supplies.
 
Noobie said:
It all evolves around the cooling process. Approximately 80% of the water (typically freshwater) withdrawn by data centers evaporates, with the remaining water discharged to municipal wastewater facilities. The large volume of wastewater from data centres may overwhelm existing local facilities, which were not designed to handle such a high volume.

With evaporation being the main cooling process, 100% of water taken in doesn't mean 100% of that water comes back out. So in countries such as the U.K. where water retention has seen very little done since victorian times, you will have vast data centre useage now fighting with other industries, even farming, for fresh water sources wether they be from rivers or the data centre companies drilling down into historic aquifers and removing that water from the social and environmental existing supplies.
Click to expand...
When steam engines had the same problem they overcame it with condensers. surely it's not beyond their wit to fit condensers to these servers?
 
Noobie said:
It all evolves around the cooling process. Approximately 80% of the water (typically freshwater) withdrawn by data centers evaporates, with the remaining water discharged to municipal wastewater facilities. The large volume of wastewater from data centres may overwhelm existing local facilities, which were not designed to handle such a high volume.

With evaporation being the main cooling process, 100% of water taken in doesn't mean 100% of that water comes back out. So in countries such as the U.K. where water retention has seen very little done since victorian times, you will have vast data centre useage now fighting with other industries, even farming, for fresh water sources wether they be from rivers or the data centre companies drilling down into historic aquifers and removing that water from the social and environmental existing supplies.
Click to expand...
Correct.. the useless wanker civil servants never seem the obvious coming or give a fuck.. we are the same in Ireland when the last big reservoir was commissioned in 1953 when Dublin was 35% the size it is now .. the water problem has been on the news since im a kid 40 years ago
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom