Yep, and they call us conspiracy nutters! What a prat.Tobbias Ellwood...nasty piece of work that he is (77th Brigade Member...which was spying on UK citizens throughout Convid...which means he should have lost his seat in the Commons), and the guy pretending to be giving CPR to a 'stabbing victim' outside the houses of parliament in that false flag event a few years ago.
Now he's claiming climate change...you couldn't make this up. Well, someone did obviously, but no right minded person could;
Tobias Ellwood MP Claims British Warships Are Immobilised by Climate Change – The Daily Sceptic
Tobbias Ellwood...nasty piece of work that he is (77th Brigade Member...which was spying on UK citizens throughout Convid...which means he should have lost his seat in the Commons), and the guy pretending to be giving CPR to a 'stabbing victim' outside the houses of parliament in that false flag event a few years ago.
Now he's claiming climate change...you couldn't make this up. Well, someone did obviously, but no right minded person could;
Tobias Ellwood MP Claims British Warships Are Immobilised by Climate Change – The Daily Sceptic
I cannot confirm or deny if tobias is part of the 77th![]()
And Noobie, of courseWell, you don't have to because it is a known fact that he is.
Rusholme
Major CO2 explosion - I wonder how many millions of tonnes this will add to this years tally and if we will see an irregular spike in 'global warming'.
Where's Greta when you need her
MSN
www.msn.com
Morning thikoThe article you cite does not mention CO2.
Get that from your Year 1 "Volcanoes" picture book did you?
Morning thiko![]()
I put it to you counsellor, that you are indeed an indoctrinated fossil, to the fuck off thread with you!The article you cite does not mention CO2.
Get that from your Year 1 "Volcanoes" picture book did you?
They do especially when they erupt but it doesn’t matter according to the expertsEcoqueer - are you suggesting that volcanic eruptions don't emit large quantities of co2?
Or just that that article doesn't mention co2? If this...then does it need to mention it for Exi's statement to be correct, or not.
you mongyShow me where it does fuckstick.
The article you cite does not mention CO2.
Get that from your Year 1 "Volcanoes" picture book did you?
Edit: 3.5 kilometres longHey Thiko: what you wittering about, if you need some info on CO2 here it is - but I suspect you already checked, hence the reasons you shied away, as you always do when you are wrong - which is often
This was the last major eruption in 2010 which emitted twice as much as all the aircraft in the world - this time there is no ash cloud to offset the worlds airliners, but a huge 2km long fissure spewing out lava which will probably emit much more than the 2010 eruption. There's no way scientists can predict how long the eruption will last. "These eruptions can often last for several days - and in the most extreme examples, several months," said a scientist
Effect on the environment
The volcano released approximately 150,000 tonnes of CO2 each day, or approximately 4.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide by 19 April 2010. The massive reduction of air travel occurring over European skies caused by the ash cloud, saved an estimated 1.3 to 2.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide from entering the atmosphere by 19 April 2010.[60][61]
![]()
Iceland volcano erupts after weeks of quake activity
A volcano erupted on Monday night in Grindavík, southwest Iceland, spewing lava and smoke across a wide area after weeks of intense earthquake activity, the country's Meteorological Office said, threatening a nearby town. Reykjavik's nearby Keflavik International Airport remained open, albeit...metro.co.uk
Major CO2 explosion - I wonder how many millions of tonnes this will add to this years tally and if we will see an irregular spike in 'global warming'.
MSN
www.msn.com
I'll take this slowly given that my audience here has the wit of a below average Bison.
Exies commences with the exclamation:
He then cites the following article in support of his claim:
I pointed out to him, with my customary accuracy, that the article he cited made no mention whatsoever of CO2.
I made no claims about volcano eruptions emitting CO2 one way or another.
I simply pointed out to him that the source he cited did not support his "Major CO2 explosion" claim.
I am well aware that precision is a foreign concept to 95% of the idiots that peruse this Forum ... I simply endeavour (in vain) to lift the appalling Grade 2 standards on here.
What a fucking hypocrite Just yesterday you accused Loz of being amused by sexual assault, when the 'Offending' meme made no mention of sexual assault. Now you are saying Exi's post didn't mention CO2 ........... Make your fucking mind up.I'll take this slowly given that my audience here has the wit of a below average Bison.
Exies commences with the exclamation:
He then cites the following article in support of his claim:
I pointed out to him, with my customary accuracy, that the article he cited made no mention whatsoever of CO2.
I made no claims about volcano eruptions emitting CO2 one way or another.
I simply pointed out to him that the source he cited did not support his "Major CO2 explosion" claim.
I am well aware that precision is a foreign concept to 95% of the idiots that peruse this Forum ... I simply endeavour (in vain) to lift the appalling Grade 2 standards on here.
What a fucking hypocrite Just yesterday you accused Loz of being amused by sexual assault, when the 'Offending' meme made no mention of sexual assault. Now you are saying Exi's post didn't mention CO2 ........... Make your fucking mind up.
If you're to thick to understand plain English I suggest you go and play with your Antipodean mates.Hello fucknuckle, to correct you (as is always required), yesterday I said the meme inferred taking sexual assault lightly, today I am asserting that the article cited by Exies DID NOT mention CO2.
Is that too difficult to comprehend for your incredibly feeble mind?
I'll take this slowly given that my audience here has the wit of a below average Bison.
Exies commences with the exclamation:
He then cites the following article in support of his claim:
I pointed out to him, with my customary accuracy, that the article he cited made no mention whatsoever of CO2.
I made no claims about volcano eruptions emitting CO2 one way or another.
I simply pointed out to him that the source he cited did not support his "Major CO2 explosion" claim.
I am well aware that precision is a foreign concept to 95% of the idiots that peruse this Forum ... I simply endeavour (in vain) to lift the appalling Grade 2 standards on here.
Or himself?If you're to thick to understand plain English I suggest you go and play with your Antipodean mates.
He is in the 5% : the bottom 5% that haven’t a fucking clueI find it funny that you think you're in the 5% and not the 95%![]()